Cotton Ginning Program in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 137
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $6,338,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Dean R Wells | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $9,086 |
102 | Riggins Farms II | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $8,237 |
103 | Allen Ellis | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $7,614 |
104 | Karrie Ellis | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $7,614 |
105 | Auza & Son Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $7,083 |
106 | Hboyz LLC | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $5,661 |
107 | D & B Farms LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $5,566 |
108 | England Farming Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $5,236 |
109 | Auza & Son Farms II | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $4,966 |
110 | D Lamoreaux Farms II | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $4,888 |
111 | Lawrence Farm Partnership | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $4,850 |
112 | Troy Skousen Farms LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $4,685 |
113 | Stagecoach Ranches LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $4,544 |
114 | Saddlehorn Ranches LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $4,544 |
115 | Brittney Irene Carranza | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $4,516 |
116 | Robert Jick Lee | Scottsdale, AZ 85258 | $4,153 |
117 | Barnes Farms LLC | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $3,441 |
118 | Gila Farms Inc | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $3,241 |
119 | Dakota Farms LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $2,930 |
120 | Shredin Farms Inc | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $2,579 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”