Farm Subsidy information
Pinal County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Pinal County, Arizona, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 209
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $26,352,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ralph S III And Carol E Dubois Living Trust | Kearny, AZ 85137 | $10,646 |
102 | Mark D Poe | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $10,198 |
103 | Janet K Poe | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $10,198 |
104 | Anthony Russell Dugan | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $9,934 |
105 | Thomas Michael Dugan Jr | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $9,934 |
106 | Timothy Scott Dugan | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $9,934 |
107 | Keeling Family Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $9,382 |
108 | Brittney Irene Carranza | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $9,266 |
109 | Tierra Verde Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $7,541 |
110 | Wade Christian Lueck | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $7,482 |
111 | Waukesha Flats LLC | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $7,024 |
112 | Auza & Son Farms II | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $6,974 |
113 | Deanna Johns | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $6,930 |
114 | , | $6,678 | |
115 | Trevor Daniel Nowlin | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $6,668 |
116 | Barnes & Sons II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $6,637 |
117 | Sff LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $6,366 |
118 | , | $6,296 | |
119 | Ronella White | Red Rock, AZ 85145 | $6,265 |
120 | Raintree Farms II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $6,197 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”