Total Disaster Programs in Pinal County, Arizona, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 167
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $11,233,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Ronella White | Red Rock, AZ 85145 | $17,424 |
102 | Keith M Flake | Snowflake, AZ 85937 | $17,197 |
103 | Trey Kelly Nowlin | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $16,843 |
104 | E & R Pork LLC | Tucson, AZ 85756 | $16,578 |
105 | , | $16,515 | |
106 | Gen III Farms LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $16,244 |
107 | Shappell Farms LLC | Gilbert, AZ 85297 | $16,039 |
108 | John O Nevitt | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $15,942 |
109 | Patrick S Granillo | Florence, AZ 85132 | $15,837 |
110 | Dairy View Farms LLC | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $15,017 |
111 | Precision Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $14,417 |
112 | William -wells Family Trst March 11 2005 | Costa Mesa, CA 92626 | $14,361 |
113 | Charles William Salmons | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $14,220 |
114 | Christine Ann Salmons | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $14,220 |
115 | Sunbelt Farms Transportation LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $13,724 |
116 | Gary Allan Vinson | Kearny, AZ 85137 | $13,541 |
117 | Bar And Farms LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $13,330 |
118 | Dart Z Farms LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $13,200 |
119 | Gary T Mix Sr | Bapchule, AZ 85121 | $12,904 |
120 | Jim Bingham | San Manuel, AZ 85631 | $12,740 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”