Farm Subsidy information
Pinal County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Pinal County, Arizona, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 209
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $26,352,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Toby S Sullivan | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $5,973 |
122 | Tressii Lakell Sullivan | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $5,973 |
123 | S & S Harvesting | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $5,862 |
124 | Mike Evans | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $5,774 |
125 | Macario Perez | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $5,545 |
126 | 3wc Land & Cattle LLC | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $5,419 |
127 | Joseph A Auza Jr | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $5,286 |
128 | 3sk Farms Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $5,236 |
129 | Lawrence Farm Partnership | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $5,192 |
130 | Keeling Family Ptshp II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $5,039 |
131 | Sunbelt Farms Transportation LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $4,965 |
132 | R A T Farms Ptshp | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $4,927 |
133 | Triple M Farms 95 | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $4,473 |
134 | Auza & Son Farms III | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $4,441 |
135 | S & T Farms LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $4,379 |
136 | Lynch Ranch Ptshp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $4,295 |
137 | Cindy Schugg | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $4,231 |
138 | Jack & Doris Henness Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $4,121 |
139 | Henness & Henness | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $3,865 |
140 | Gillespie Farms Gp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $3,814 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”