Total Disaster Programs in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 630
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $50,986,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Ak Chin Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85239 | $95,156 |
122 | Gabriel Flores | Soledad, CA 93960 | $92,926 |
123 | Bernardo L Vasquez | Soledad, CA 93960 | $92,926 |
124 | Belloc's Inc | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $91,681 |
125 | Chris Warren Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $91,421 |
126 | Firma Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $89,054 |
127 | Travis Dean Hartman Dba Caywood Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $88,351 |
128 | Gillespie Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $87,552 |
129 | Armando Lawrence Rodriguez | Winkelman, AZ 85192 | $86,745 |
130 | Pearce Farms Ptshp | Eloy, AZ 85231 | $84,826 |
131 | Martin Ranch Inc | Superior, AZ 85173 | $84,699 |
132 | Glf Inc | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $83,302 |
133 | John Voigts Dba Sunbelt Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $82,758 |
134 | , | $81,351 | |
135 | Michael James Mercer | Mammoth, AZ 85618 | $81,286 |
136 | John Thude Farms Ptnshp | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $80,840 |
137 | Rafter D Cattle Company, Inc. | Scottsdale, AZ 85266 | $80,696 |
138 | Isom & Isom | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $80,014 |
139 | Empire Investment LLC | Queen Creek, AZ 85242 | $80,000 |
140 | Estate Of J A Roberts | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $80,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”