Market Loss Assistance Program in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 627
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $43,804,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Jayne Gladden | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $111,934 |
122 | Buford Douglas Gladden | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $111,934 |
123 | Marcus D Martin Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $110,342 |
124 | Red Rock Cattle Co | Red Rock, AZ 85245 | $109,798 |
125 | Vineyard Farms LLC | Tempe, AZ 85284 | $109,330 |
126 | Nodak Farming Co | Mesa, AZ 85215 | $108,538 |
127 | Justin Roberts | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $107,247 |
128 | Hour Farms Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $106,276 |
129 | Ellis Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $105,112 |
130 | Huerta Packing Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $105,062 |
131 | Ar Gee Bee Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $105,004 |
132 | Sundance Farms Llp | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $103,869 |
133 | Gila Ranch Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $102,986 |
134 | Claude Brown | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $102,443 |
135 | Mcfarland Farms II | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $101,696 |
136 | Elaine Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $100,280 |
137 | Patricia Robertson Revocable Trus | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $99,888 |
138 | Rio Blanco LLC | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $99,809 |
139 | James Preston Porter | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $99,324 |
140 | Cardenas Brothers | Eloy, AZ 85231 | $99,143 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”