Total Disaster Programs in Pinal County, Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 99
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $4,136,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Itty Bitty Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $47,548 |
22 | River Bush Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $41,368 |
23 | Ronella White | Red Rock, AZ 85145 | $38,103 |
24 | Shepley Ranch LLC | Tucson, AZ 85755 | $34,099 |
25 | Brynn-con Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $34,011 |
26 | Frank Shedd & Son Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $32,254 |
27 | Le Smith Farms Ptshp | Mesa, AZ 85207 | $31,935 |
28 | Jbh Farming | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $31,593 |
29 | John & Lorna Nevitt Farms | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $30,996 |
30 | Twitty Farms LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $30,737 |
31 | Raintree Farms II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $29,660 |
32 | Rail 3 Az, LLC | Florence, AZ 85132 | $28,559 |
33 | Barnes & Sons II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $27,724 |
34 | Jacqueline Mae Warren Dba B & J Farms | Arizona City, AZ 85123 | $27,612 |
35 | Rafter D Cattle Company, Inc. | Scottsdale, AZ 85266 | $25,958 |
36 | Antonio M Haro Bianem Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $25,778 |
37 | Ramona Enterprises LLC | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $24,117 |
38 | Mark D Smith Enterprises Inc | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $23,502 |
39 | Dnh Cattle Co LLC | Mesa, AZ 85207 | $23,198 |
40 | Jim Bingham | San Manuel, AZ 85631 | $21,461 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”