Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 202
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $33,999,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sunny Mesa Inc | Mesa, AZ 85206 | $243,197 |
42 | Jbh Farming | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $241,918 |
43 | Gable & Hardison Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $241,739 |
44 | Raintree Farms II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $240,746 |
45 | Rancho Pobre Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $232,659 |
46 | Antonio M Haro Bianem Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $231,482 |
47 | Mark Poe Rpt Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $230,064 |
48 | Casa Grande Dairy Company LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $229,273 |
49 | Dairy View Farms LLC | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $227,697 |
50 | David Feenstra Dba Feenstra Friesians | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $221,805 |
51 | Windmill Dairy LLC Dba El Dorado Dairy | Casa Grande, AZ 85128 | $213,205 |
52 | Hiscox Farms Gp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $206,528 |
53 | Du-brook Dairy Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $204,225 |
54 | Mdm Farms Ptshp | Mesa, AZ 85206 | $199,875 |
55 | Cooley Farms LLC | Mesa, AZ 85212 | $195,577 |
56 | Nixon Cotton | Mesa, AZ 85206 | $182,082 |
57 | Don Pew Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $181,378 |
58 | Richard Anglin Dairy Inc | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $177,087 |
59 | Keeling Family Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $176,477 |
60 | Dust Boll Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $175,675 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”