Total Conservation Programs in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 223
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $4,830,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Monument Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $31,263 |
42 | Elmore/brimhall LLC | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $30,361 |
43 | Everett P Stone Sr | Bapchule, AZ 85221 | $30,226 |
44 | Sif Oidak District Livestock & Ra | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $29,943 |
45 | Hartman Ranch Ptshp | Maricopa, AZ 85239 | $29,750 |
46 | Douglas M Payne | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $29,745 |
47 | Nevitt Farms Ltd Ptshp | Queen Creek, AZ 85242 | $29,562 |
48 | James R Mccreery | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $28,738 |
49 | Ramona Farms | Sacaton, AZ 85247 | $28,181 |
50 | Kai Farms-redrock LLC | Tucson, AZ 85705 | $27,711 |
51 | Jetray Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $26,738 |
52 | Tierra Verde Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $26,580 |
53 | I-8 D Properties Ltd Ptshp | Phoenix, AZ 85004 | $26,425 |
54 | K-investment Enterprises Llp | Maricopa, AZ 85239 | $26,108 |
55 | Santa Cruz Ranch | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $25,716 |
56 | Wuertz Farm | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $25,216 |
57 | C B C Farms Inc | Sacaton, AZ 85247 | $24,900 |
58 | Urton Farms Ptshp | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $24,481 |
59 | Bingham Sacaton Ranch Inc | San Manuel, AZ 85631 | $23,490 |
60 | Doyle Shahan | Queen Creek, AZ 85242 | $23,357 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”