Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Yavapai County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 82
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Yavapai County, Arizona totaled $2,048,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Viterbo Cattle Co LLC | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $33,752 |
22 | C Bar S Land & Cattle Co LLC | Prescott, AZ 86301 | $29,954 |
23 | Cross Mountain Sheep Co | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $28,085 |
24 | Windmill Mountain Ranch LLC | Sedona, AZ 86336 | $28,076 |
25 | Leist Land And Livestock LLC. | Ash Fork, AZ 86320 | $27,092 |
26 | M Diamond Management Co LLC | Rimrock, AZ 86335 | $26,924 |
27 | Kelton Cattle Co LLC | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $26,022 |
28 | James Fletcher | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $25,347 |
29 | Sunflower Livestock LLC | Bagdad, AZ 86321 | $24,317 |
30 | Joe Campbell | Seligman, AZ 86337 | $24,279 |
31 | , | $23,607 | |
32 | Zeid Family Revocable Trust | Camp Verde, AZ 86322 | $23,011 |
33 | Dugas Ranch | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $20,750 |
34 | Moore And Moore Ranch LLC | Congress, AZ 85332 | $20,695 |
35 | Logan D Anderson | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $20,388 |
36 | Carol Fletcher | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $18,981 |
37 | Orme Ranch Inc | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $18,622 |
38 | Ay Land & Cattle Co LLC | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $18,458 |
39 | John T Cauthen | Ash Fork, AZ 86320 | $17,502 |
40 | Owen Cattle Co LLC | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $15,844 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”