Farm Subsidy information
Yavapai County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Yavapai County, Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 92
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yavapai County, Arizona totaled $4,187,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ben Kimball | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $15,429 |
42 | Little Horse Ranch Lllp | Phoenix, AZ 85004 | $14,504 |
43 | Leist Land And Livestock LLC. | Ash Fork, AZ 86320 | $14,196 |
44 | Nash Russell Stansfield | Kingman, AZ 86409 | $14,025 |
45 | Stephen Neshem | Prescott, AZ 86301 | $13,609 |
46 | Stephen N Hampton | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $12,657 |
47 | Olson Cattle Company LLC | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $11,385 |
48 | Jerry L Brimhall | Saint David, AZ 85630 | $11,335 |
49 | Silkie Perkins | Clarkdale, AZ 86324 | $10,328 |
50 | Brandon William Baba | Waterford, CA 95386 | $10,302 |
51 | Jh Cattle Company LLC | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $10,261 |
52 | Lueck Land & Cattle LLC | Mesa, AZ 85209 | $10,142 |
53 | Square M Ranch | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $10,065 |
54 | T Bruce Koger | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $9,443 |
55 | Seibert Livestock, LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85014 | $8,566 |
56 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $7,870 |
57 | It's The Water Inc | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $7,487 |
58 | Rigden Ranch Inc | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $7,028 |
59 | Kelton Cattle Co LLC | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $6,900 |
60 | Enoch Malouff | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $6,803 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”