Total Commodity Programs in Yavapai County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 125
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Yavapai County, Arizona totaled $4,788,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | House Mountain Vineyards LLC | Tempe, AZ 85284 | $4,303 |
102 | Ryan Seis LLC | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $3,811 |
103 | Barbed J Beef LLC | Camp Verde, AZ 86322 | $3,699 |
104 | Ben Kimball | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $3,575 |
105 | The Flying 4 C Ranch LLC | Humboldt, AZ 86329 | $3,355 |
106 | Kelly Powell | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $3,061 |
107 | Barbed J Beef LLC | Camp Verde, AZ 86322 | $2,275 |
108 | Ruth Marie Lilly Johnston | Prescott Valley, AZ 86314 | $2,087 |
109 | Charles Trulin Johnston | Skull Valley, AZ 86338 | $2,070 |
110 | The Ranch In Ash Fork LLC | Ash Fork, AZ 86320 | $1,996 |
111 | Kenneth W James | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $1,925 |
112 | Ryan Seis LLC | Paulden, AZ 86334 | $1,924 |
113 | Yavpe' Ma'ta Co | Prescott, AZ 86304 | $1,760 |
114 | Tres Bees LLC | Springfield, CO 81073 | $1,669 |
115 | Page Springs Vineyard LLC | Cornville, AZ 86325 | $1,232 |
116 | Natural Grocers By Vitamin Cottag | Lakewood, CO 80228 | $1,000 |
117 | Emily Hughes | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $816 |
118 | Good Omen Bottling, LLC | Cottonwood, AZ 86326 | $750 |
119 | Pine Crest Angora | Prescott, AZ 86302 | $671 |
120 | Charles Oldham | Yarnell, AZ 85362 | $571 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”