Farm Subsidy information
Yavapai County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Yavapai County, Arizona, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 333
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yavapai County, Arizona totaled $28,375,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kelton Cattle Co LLC | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $261,256 |
22 | James P Fancher | Wikieup, AZ 85360 | $249,043 |
23 | Kimberly Knight | Wickenburg, AZ 85358 | $241,812 |
24 | Logan D Anderson | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $236,495 |
25 | Stephen Neshem | Prescott, AZ 86301 | $233,300 |
26 | Parker Dairy Farms Inc | Congress, AZ 85332 | $233,254 |
27 | Bar D Cattle Co LLC | Peoria, AZ 85383 | $230,258 |
28 | Four Leaf Cattle Co LLC | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $211,769 |
29 | Orme Ranch Inc | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $208,218 |
30 | Sunflower Livestock LLC | Bagdad, AZ 86321 | $207,726 |
31 | M Diamond Management Co LLC | Rimrock, AZ 86335 | $202,714 |
32 | James Fletcher | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $198,453 |
33 | J Sherrick Grantham | Congress, AZ 85332 | $179,428 |
34 | Viterbo Cattle Co LLC | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $169,639 |
35 | John T Cauthen | Ash Fork, AZ 86320 | $164,783 |
36 | Cross Mountain Sheep Co | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $162,392 |
37 | W J Wells | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $154,686 |
38 | Stephen N Hampton | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $152,086 |
39 | Dugas Ranch | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $148,509 |
40 | Gary Mortimer | Dewey, AZ 86327 | $146,498 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”