Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Yavapai County, Arizona, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 76
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Yavapai County, Arizona totaled $603,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Camp Wood Cattle Co LLC | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $40,448 |
2 | Kellis Ranch Co | Bagdad, AZ 86321 | $38,327 |
3 | Yavapai Ranch Lp | Scottsdale, AZ 85253 | $37,348 |
4 | Little Horse Ranch Lllp | Phoenix, AZ 85004 | $24,046 |
5 | , | $23,607 | |
6 | Blackmore Family Trust | Bagdad, AZ 86321 | $22,350 |
7 | Richard H Smyer | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $19,046 |
8 | John T Holbrook | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $18,992 |
9 | Forepaugh Cattle Co Inc | Wickenburg, AZ 85358 | $17,989 |
10 | Logan Hefner | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $17,627 |
11 | Seven Hl Wright Cattle Co LLC | Cottonwood, AZ 86326 | $15,020 |
12 | Kimberly Knight | Wickenburg, AZ 85358 | $13,899 |
13 | Jd Cattle LLC | Skull Valley, AZ 86338 | $12,918 |
14 | Thomas R Hamill | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $12,391 |
15 | Four Leaf Cattle Co LLC | Mayer, AZ 86333 | $11,858 |
16 | Major Cattle Co LLC | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $11,511 |
17 | Perkins Ranch Inc | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $11,367 |
18 | Viterbo Cattle Co LLC | Kirkland, AZ 86332 | $11,300 |
19 | C Bar S Land & Cattle Co LLC | Prescott, AZ 86301 | $10,031 |
20 | Cross Mountain Sheep Co | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $9,661 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>