Farm Subsidy information
Yuma County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Yuma County, Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 114
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Yuma County, Arizona totaled $6,109,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Consaul Ranches LLC | Somerton, AZ 85350 | $38,637 |
42 | Bsn Farms Ptn | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $36,765 |
43 | Ag Tech LLC | Somerton, AZ 85350 | $35,501 |
44 | Priority Pollination , LLC | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $35,155 |
45 | Triskee LLC | Roll, AZ 85347 | $34,813 |
46 | Trent Erling Farms Inc | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $34,544 |
47 | Arizona Organic Fisheries, LLC | Dateland, AZ 85333 | $34,070 |
48 | Ns Medjool Lp | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $33,756 |
49 | Sierra Negra Farms | Wickenburg, AZ 85358 | $33,643 |
50 | Daily Farms Inc | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $27,927 |
51 | Skousen Farms Partnership | Dateland, AZ 85333 | $26,978 |
52 | Charles L Emmons II And Lisa D Emmons Partnership | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $26,474 |
53 | Desert Premium Farms LLC | Yuma, AZ 85367 | $26,467 |
54 | Amigo Farms Inc | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $25,384 |
55 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $24,952 |
56 | Summertime Farms Partnership | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $22,833 |
57 | Bart W Honeycutt Farms | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $22,108 |
58 | Dome Valley Dirt, LLC | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $22,041 |
59 | Bess Williams | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $20,477 |
60 | Chaison Ott Dba Chaison Farms | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $20,003 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”