Loan Deficiency in Yuma County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 156
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Yuma County, Arizona totaled $10,809,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dome Valley Farms Inc | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $80,688 |
42 | Joseph Hoffman | Tacna, AZ 85352 | $80,517 |
43 | John Donley | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $80,474 |
44 | Nakasawa Farms LLC | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $79,398 |
45 | Cullison Farms | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $76,846 |
46 | Robert Nickerson Farms Inc | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $73,511 |
47 | Blohm Farms Partnership | Roll, AZ 85347 | $69,258 |
48 | Walls & Erling | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $68,775 |
49 | Smt Farms LLC | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $67,751 |
50 | Tim Dunn Farms Inc | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $64,323 |
51 | Wiechens Farms Inc | Roll, AZ 85347 | $63,512 |
52 | Matthew T Mellon | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $63,345 |
53 | Deborah Wiechens | Roll, AZ 85347 | $62,411 |
54 | Amigo Farms Inc | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $61,779 |
55 | Burnis Williams Trust | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $61,695 |
56 | Murdock Farms | Roll, AZ 85347 | $58,331 |
57 | Lyreedale Farms General Partnersh | Roll, AZ 85347 | $57,643 |
58 | Moore & Moore Ranches | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $57,087 |
59 | Desert Premium Farms LLC | Yuma, AZ 85367 | $54,118 |
60 | Brent A Williams | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $53,811 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”