Total Commodity Programs in Yuma County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 466
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Yuma County, Arizona totaled $165,097,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | G P A Management Group | Tempe, AZ 85284 | $9,844,360 |
| 2 | Texas Hill Farms | Roll, AZ 85347 | $4,453,467 |
| 3 | Cullison Farms | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $4,323,194 |
| 4 | Harrison Farms Family Partnership | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $4,228,530 |
| 5 | Blohm Farms Partnership | Roll, AZ 85347 | $3,264,256 |
| 6 | 4 B Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85008 | $3,226,161 |
| 7 | Gila Valley Farms L P | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $2,995,797 |
| 8 | Barkley Company Of Az Ptn | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $2,791,692 |
| 9 | L & R Corporation | Somerton, AZ 85350 | $2,452,856 |
| 10 | Doug Mellon Farms II Inc | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $2,375,944 |
| 11 | Bsn Farms Ptn | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $2,322,951 |
| 12 | Griffin Family Farm LLC | Somerton, AZ 85350 | $2,098,243 |
| 13 | Gary Wiechens | Roll, AZ 85347 | $1,989,409 |
| 14 | Glu-cav Farms | San Diego, CA 92170 | $1,969,301 |
| 15 | Walls & Erling | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $1,965,746 |
| 16 | Marlatt Brothers | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $1,950,470 |
| 17 | Amigo Farms Inc | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $1,922,153 |
| 18 | Lyreedale Farms General Partnersh | Roll, AZ 85347 | $1,897,971 |
| 19 | Gila Monster Joint Venture | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $1,773,344 |
| 20 | J-v Farms, Inc | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $1,735,891 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
