Farm Subsidy information
Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 22,852
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arkansas totaled $481,969,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Carpenter Produce | Grady, AR 71644 | $4,453,215 |
2 | Griffin Farms South | Helena, AR 72342 | $2,779,247 |
3 | Merchants & Planters Bank ** | Newport, AR 72112 | $2,003,880 |
4 | Deline Farms South | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,702,111 |
5 | Eagle Lake Farm Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,317,120 |
6 | J M Malone & Son Inc | Lonoke, AR 72086 | $1,241,081 |
7 | Dunns Fish Farms Inc | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $827,967 |
8 | Carpenter Produce Farms Inc | Grady, AR 71644 | $793,007 |
9 | Rdfarm Group | Marvell, AR 72366 | $779,038 |
10 | Roelee Farms | Palestine, AR 72372 | $778,613 |
11 | K & A Sealy Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $635,058 |
12 | Deline Farms North | Charleston, MO 63834 | $619,464 |
13 | Deline Farms Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $616,849 |
14 | G & P Farm Partnership | Grady, AR 71644 | $616,739 |
15 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $611,683 |
16 | Oxner Ag Partnership | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $581,888 |
17 | Red River Farms | Searcy, AR 72143 | $569,114 |
18 | Amos Farms | Wynne, AR 72396 | $560,779 |
19 | Coffee Creek Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $554,916 |
20 | Whitetail Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $534,190 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>