Total Emergency Relief Program in Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,162
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Arkansas totaled $155,420,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Carpenter Produce | Grady, AR 71644 | $2,869,445 |
2 | Griffin Farms South | Helena, AR 72342 | $2,654,232 |
3 | Merchants & Planters Bank ** | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,729,751 |
4 | Deline Farms South | Charleston, MO 63834 | $1,645,461 |
5 | Eagle Lake Farm Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,266,986 |
6 | Rdfarm Group | Marvell, AR 72366 | $779,038 |
7 | Roelee Farms | Palestine, AR 72372 | $707,797 |
8 | K & A Sealy Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $616,542 |
9 | Deline Farms North | Charleston, MO 63834 | $610,985 |
10 | G & P Farm Partnership | Grady, AR 71644 | $591,809 |
11 | Oxner Ag Partnership | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $575,134 |
12 | Carpenter Produce Farms Inc | Grady, AR 71644 | $559,051 |
13 | Deline Farms Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $552,785 |
14 | Coffee Creek Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $546,941 |
15 | Whitetail Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $504,524 |
16 | Amos Farms | Wynne, AR 72396 | $495,334 |
17 | Red River Farms | Searcy, AR 72143 | $489,202 |
18 | Porter Farms | Searcy, AR 72143 | $475,231 |
19 | C & A Heidelberger Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $474,496 |
20 | Baxter Brothers Farms | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $474,080 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>