Farm Subsidy information
Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 22,852
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arkansas totaled $481,969,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Benwood Farms | Earle, AR 72331 | $528,806 |
22 | Royal C Farms LLC | Crossett, AR 71635 | $511,414 |
23 | Agheritage ** | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $503,120 |
24 | Baxter Brothers Farms | Biscoe, AR 72017 | $496,698 |
25 | Porter Farms | Searcy, AR 72143 | $494,685 |
26 | Sand Land Farms Inc | Leachville, AR 72438 | $491,604 |
27 | C & A Heidelberger Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $491,116 |
28 | View Point Farms LLC | Ashdown, AR 71822 | $473,665 |
29 | Palsa Plantation | Tillar, AR 71670 | $466,632 |
30 | West Ark Farming Company | Atkins, AR 72823 | $456,607 |
31 | Berries By Bill Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $444,157 |
32 | King Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $443,338 |
33 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $441,499 |
34 | C & D Farms | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $424,909 |
35 | Brocato And Unger Farms | Marvell, AR 72366 | $422,058 |
36 | Farmers & Merchants Bank ** | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $413,868 |
37 | Brantley Farming Co | England, AR 72046 | $402,182 |
38 | Patricia K Smith | Bradford, AR 72020 | $399,368 |
39 | Gary Roberts Farms | Dumas, AR 71639 | $398,074 |
40 | Cross County Bank ** | Wynne, AR 72396 | $397,454 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”