Loan Deficiency in Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 26,871
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Arkansas totaled $986,680,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Red Farms Ptrn | De Witt, AR 72042 | $1,331,566 |
22 | Three Boeckmann Farm Partnership | Wynne, AR 72396 | $1,243,955 |
23 | Two Rivers Farm | Sevierville, TN 37862 | $1,220,572 |
24 | Ziegenhorn Seed Farms Partnership | Fisher, AR 72429 | $1,175,212 |
25 | James Farm Joint Venture | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $1,159,613 |
26 | May Farms | Brickeys, AR 72320 | $1,158,494 |
27 | Double G Farms | Marianna, AR 72360 | $1,125,818 |
28 | Pat H Henderson Farms | England, AR 72046 | $1,122,634 |
29 | Triple B Farms | Humnoke, AR 72072 | $1,095,230 |
30 | Voyles Farms | Parkin, AR 72373 | $1,093,898 |
31 | B & G Agri | Newport, AR 72112 | $1,090,705 |
32 | West Company Partnership | Nashville, TN 37215 | $1,077,147 |
33 | Arrowhead Farms | Holly Grove, AR 72069 | $1,074,977 |
34 | Jessland Plantation | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $1,074,098 |
35 | R A Pickens And Son Company | Pickens, AR 71662 | $1,059,228 |
36 | Stuckey Farms Company | Clarkedale, AR 72325 | $1,040,935 |
37 | Watson & Watson | De Witt, AR 72042 | $1,037,491 |
38 | Wakefield Prtnrs | Augusta, AR 72006 | $1,027,891 |
39 | Gray Farms Ptr | Delaplaine, AR 72425 | $1,015,341 |
40 | Stephen & Brent Davis Farm | Cotton Plant, AR 72036 | $1,012,854 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”