Total Conservation Programs in Arkansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,875
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Arkansas totaled $17,526,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bbb Ark-la-ms Farms | Indianola, MS 38751 | $53,033 |
22 | Thomas B Fitzhugh | Augusta, AR 72006 | $52,830 |
23 | Mcentire Farms Inc | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $52,368 |
24 | Norsworthy Land Co | England, AR 72046 | $51,597 |
25 | Hasty Family Limited Ptrn | Almyra, AR 72003 | $51,540 |
26 | 7-11 Farm Partnership | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $51,316 |
27 | Foll Farms Inc | Pleasant Grove, AR 72567 | $50,000 |
28 | Charles F Robbins | Portland, AR 71663 | $50,000 |
29 | Elbow Slough LLC | Memphis, TN 38120 | $50,000 |
30 | Dusty Sue LLC | Hot Springs, AR 71913 | $50,000 |
31 | , | $50,000 | |
32 | Kline-pippen LLC | Pine Bluff, AR 71611 | $49,028 |
33 | Hutchinson Family Irr Trust | Newport, AR 72112 | $48,626 |
34 | Ww Conservation Partnership | Little Rock, AR 72202 | $48,610 |
35 | Wells Investments, Lp | Memphis, TN 38137 | $48,263 |
36 | , | $46,774 | |
37 | Ronald K Suzore Irrv Tr Number Two Dated 11202019 | Memphis, TN 38127 | $46,685 |
38 | Pattie Louise Suzore Irrv Tr Number Two Dated 1120 | Memphis, TN 38127 | $46,685 |
39 | Sedric E Banks | Monroe, LA 71201 | $45,941 |
40 | Gay Farms Inc | Portland, AR 71663 | $45,872 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”