Conservation Reserve Program in Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 10,893
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Arkansas totaled $412,060,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | S E Tucker Plantation LLC | Little Rock, AR 72207 | $622,385 |
42 | Hasty Family Limited Ptrn | Almyra, AR 72003 | $610,222 |
43 | Mccool Inc | Danville, AR 72833 | $590,631 |
44 | Wolbrecht Family Partners Lp | Germantown, TN 38138 | $584,242 |
45 | Lazy Acres Farm | Dumas, AR 71639 | $574,356 |
46 | Hutchinson Family Irr Trust | Newport, AR 72112 | $572,165 |
47 | Stew Crew Management | Wynne, AR 72396 | $567,619 |
48 | Brantley Farming Co | England, AR 72046 | $565,925 |
49 | Silvilands Inc | Monticello, AR 71657 | $562,625 |
50 | Gum Point Land Co LLC | Dumas, AR 71639 | $561,163 |
51 | Dorothy Nelon Davis Trust | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $559,095 |
52 | Bbb Ark-la-ms Farms | Indianola, MS 38751 | $558,663 |
53 | L'anguille Club LLC | Marion, AR 72364 | $557,024 |
54 | Gay Lacy III | Newport, AR 72112 | $548,614 |
55 | Fletcher Farm | Little Rock, AR 72206 | $545,242 |
56 | Las Esposas Land Owners | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $545,090 |
57 | Webb Family Trust | Griffithville, AR 72060 | $544,648 |
58 | John D Naill & Son Inc | Little Rock, AR 72221 | $540,857 |
59 | Nina Ruth Selig | Tichnor, AR 72166 | $532,689 |
60 | Six Pine Trees Inc | El Campo, TX 77437 | $529,817 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”