Total Commodity Programs in Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 80,659
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Arkansas totaled $12,811,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Edward Schafer & Sons | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $9,960,658 |
42 | Holthouse Farms | Osceola, AR 72370 | $9,952,412 |
43 | Eagle Lake Farm Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $9,760,213 |
44 | Storey Farming | Marvell, AR 72366 | $9,574,738 |
45 | James Farm Joint Venture | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $9,532,258 |
46 | Sellmeyer Farms Joint Venture | Knobel, AR 72435 | $9,460,878 |
47 | Vincent Farms | Crawfordsville, AR 72327 | $9,329,370 |
48 | Henderson Land & Cattle Co | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $9,306,411 |
49 | Coleman Farms Ptr | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $9,054,849 |
50 | King Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $8,962,241 |
51 | Fogleman Farms No 2 | Marion, AR 72364 | $8,897,740 |
52 | Yocum Farms | Dermott, AR 71638 | $8,881,087 |
53 | Farmers Farm | Osceola, AR 72370 | $8,766,079 |
54 | Young And Co | Poplar Grove, AR 72374 | $8,708,408 |
55 | Leslie T Brown Farms | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $8,706,724 |
56 | Gammill Farms | Tyronza, AR 72386 | $8,539,783 |
57 | Swift Ditch Farms Partnership | Trumann, AR 72472 | $8,456,741 |
58 | Clover Bend Fms | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $8,318,292 |
59 | Long Lake Plantation | Helena, AR 72342 | $8,173,213 |
60 | Stephen & Brent Davis Farm | Cotton Plant, AR 72036 | $7,872,063 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”