Total Commodity Programs in Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 10,042
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Arkansas totaled $40,433,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Yancey Farms Partners | Collierville, TN 38017 | $62,126 |
42 | Lawrence Agri | Elaine, AR 72333 | $60,838 |
43 | Cureton Farm Partnership | Cash, AR 72421 | $59,088 |
44 | Darrell Brady & Sons Ptr | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $58,176 |
45 | Medford Farm Partnership | Hunter, AR 72074 | $57,950 |
46 | Focus Bank ** | Charleston, MO 63834 | $57,388 |
47 | Mcdougal Farms | Piggott, AR 72454 | $56,655 |
48 | Deline Farms South | Charleston, MO 63834 | $56,650 |
49 | Big S Farms | Hunter, AR 72074 | $56,216 |
50 | Leslie T Brown Farms | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $55,938 |
51 | Blackadder Farms Partnership | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $55,720 |
52 | Capps Farm Ptr | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $54,224 |
53 | Arkansas County Bank ** | De Witt, AR 72042 | $52,870 |
54 | St Clair Planting Co | Marion, AR 72364 | $52,784 |
55 | Toll Farms | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $52,663 |
56 | Victoria Partnership | Osceola, AR 72370 | $51,747 |
57 | Creekwater Farms | Paragould, AR 72450 | $51,565 |
58 | Stephen & Brent Davis Farm | Cotton Plant, AR 72036 | $50,561 |
59 | Medford & Sons | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $50,478 |
60 | W & W Farms | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $50,430 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”