Total Commodity Programs in Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 10,042
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Arkansas totaled $40,433,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | H & J Land Company | Newport, AR 72112 | $45,252 |
82 | Tripp Farms III | Searcy, AR 72143 | $45,210 |
83 | Jimmie A Cole & Son | Reyno, AR 72462 | $44,235 |
84 | Swifton Farms Ptnrs | Swifton, AR 72471 | $43,576 |
85 | Tupelo Planting Co | Tupelo, AR 72169 | $43,248 |
86 | English Lake Partnership | Tulsa, OK 74137 | $42,918 |
87 | Bell Planting Company | Bassett, AR 72313 | $42,520 |
88 | Freeland Farms Partnership | Palestine, AR 72372 | $42,383 |
89 | Riverside Farms | Wynne, AR 72396 | $42,336 |
90 | Trinity Farms Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $42,280 |
91 | Samson Partnership | Dermott, AR 71638 | $42,270 |
92 | Gene Melton & Sons Ptn | Sulphur Rock, AR 72579 | $42,062 |
93 | Mcgehee Farm And Real Estate An A | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $41,994 |
94 | Caney Creek Farms Ptn II | Wynne, AR 72396 | $41,176 |
95 | Triple B Farms | Humnoke, AR 72072 | $40,940 |
96 | Lmn Farms Partnership | Corning, AR 72422 | $40,800 |
97 | Coker Farm Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $40,708 |
98 | M Blake Dodd | Knobel, AR 72435 | $40,157 |
99 | Jennifer & Samuel Medford Farms | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $40,149 |
100 | Boyd Farms Partnership | Paragould, AR 72450 | $39,884 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”