Total Conservation Programs in Arkansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 2,875
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Arkansas totaled $17,526,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Bejay Farms Inc | Little Rock, AR 72211 | $30,426 |
102 | John E Stephens Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $30,270 |
103 | Rosebud Nicholson Frms Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $29,704 |
104 | Frank Calvin Love Jr | Newport, AR 72112 | $29,680 |
105 | Cornerstone Farm & Gin Company & Subsidiary | Pine Bluff, AR 71611 | $29,593 |
106 | S E Tucker Plantation LLC | Little Rock, AR 72207 | $29,282 |
107 | Thebes General Partnership | Portland, AR 71663 | $29,183 |
108 | Mike Whitney | Oak Grove, LA 71263 | $29,041 |
109 | Keo Fish Farm Inc | Keo, AR 72083 | $28,993 |
110 | Roberts Management Co Inc | Forrest City, AR 72336 | $28,638 |
111 | Mazzanti-earl Farm | Little Rock, AR 72201 | $28,367 |
112 | Howard A Rands Sr Trust | Dumas, AR 71639 | $28,298 |
113 | Gertrude Keel Est Ptnrs | Heber Springs, AR 72543 | $28,026 |
114 | , | $27,921 | |
115 | , | $27,648 | |
116 | Connie S Taylor | Raleigh, NC 27614 | $27,521 |
117 | , | $27,494 | |
118 | Justin Petrus | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $27,419 |
119 | David S Wallace | Crawfordsville, AR 72327 | $27,229 |
120 | The Coon LLC | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $27,205 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”