Farm Subsidy information
Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 102,828
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arkansas totaled $15,877,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Helena National Bank ** | Helena, AR 72342 | $10,190,457 |
42 | Bearskin Farms | Scott, AR 72142 | $10,085,644 |
43 | Holthouse Farms | Osceola, AR 72370 | $10,004,832 |
44 | Edward Schafer & Sons | Carlisle, AR 72024 | $10,004,678 |
45 | James Farm Joint Venture | Walnut Ridge, AR 72476 | $9,989,453 |
46 | Storey Farming | Marvell, AR 72366 | $9,896,057 |
47 | Sellmeyer Farms Joint Venture | Knobel, AR 72435 | $9,735,919 |
48 | Henderson Land & Cattle Co | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $9,552,769 |
49 | Vincent Farms | Crawfordsville, AR 72327 | $9,420,958 |
50 | King Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $9,350,985 |
51 | Fogleman Farms No 2 | Marion, AR 72364 | $9,133,395 |
52 | Coleman Farms Ptr | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $9,112,201 |
53 | Swift Ditch Farms Partnership | Trumann, AR 72472 | $9,057,498 |
54 | Yocum Farms | Dermott, AR 71638 | $8,951,243 |
55 | Young And Co | Poplar Grove, AR 72374 | $8,933,568 |
56 | Gammill Farms | Tyronza, AR 72386 | $8,856,546 |
57 | Farmers Farm | Osceola, AR 72370 | $8,792,457 |
58 | Leslie T Brown Farms | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $8,731,328 |
59 | Long Lake Plantation | Helena, AR 72342 | $8,581,087 |
60 | Clover Bend Fms | Jonesboro, AR 72404 | $8,317,738 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”