Conservation Reserve Program in Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 10,261
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Arkansas totaled $377,272,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Mccool Inc | Danville, AR 72833 | $559,611 |
| 42 | S E Tucker Plantation LLC | Little Rock, AR 72207 | $557,835 |
| 43 | Gay Lacy III | Newport, AR 72112 | $548,614 |
| 44 | Fletcher Farm | Little Rock, AR 72206 | $545,242 |
| 45 | Webb Family Trust | Griffithville, AR 72060 | $544,648 |
| 46 | John D Naill & Son Inc | Little Rock, AR 72221 | $540,857 |
| 47 | Six Pine Trees Inc | El Campo, TX 77437 | $529,817 |
| 48 | Lazy Acres Farm | Dumas, AR 71639 | $528,488 |
| 49 | Silvilands Inc | Monticello, AR 71657 | $516,054 |
| 50 | Reidhar Enterprise Inc | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $515,964 |
| 51 | Gum Point Land Co LLC | Dumas, AR 71639 | $512,053 |
| 52 | Dale Handly | Monticello, AR 71655 | $508,111 |
| 53 | I-55 Corp | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $503,815 |
| 54 | Hasty Family Limited Ptrn | Almyra, AR 72003 | $502,872 |
| 55 | L'anguille Club LLC | Marion, AR 72364 | $492,169 |
| 56 | Dorothy Nelon Davis Trust | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $491,703 |
| 57 | Price Services Inc | Monticello, AR 71655 | $487,001 |
| 58 | Brantley Farming Co | England, AR 72046 | $485,509 |
| 59 | 1000 Acre Wood Inc | El Campo, TX 77437 | $481,256 |
| 60 | Hutchinson Family Irr Trust | Newport, AR 72112 | $477,547 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf