Total Conservation Programs in Arkansas, 2020

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,188

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Arkansas totaled $16,509,000 in in 2020.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
2020
21Hampton General PartnershipStuttgart, AR 72160$49,646
22Fairfax Fullerton FairHouston, TX 77025$48,467
23Ww Conservation PartnershipLittle Rock, AR 72202$47,765
24Ronald K Suzore Irrv Tr Number Two Dated 11202019Memphis, TN 38127$46,685
25Pattie Louise Suzore Irrv Tr Number Two Dated 1120Memphis, TN 38127$46,685
26Gay Farms IncPortland, AR 71663$45,872
27John HortonForrest City, AR 72335$44,837
28Dorothy S Caraway TrustBatesville, AR 72501$43,286
29Boggy Bayou Land LLCMobile, AL 36633$42,930
30Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$42,198
31Gay Lacy IIINewport, AR 72112$41,837
32Castor Rice CoAltheimer, AR 72004$41,808
33Walker Jones Land Co LLCStuttgart, AR 72160$41,797
34Curtis Floyd Crisp-curtis And Vicky Crisp RevocablElaine, AR 72333$41,337
35White Oaks Duck Woods South Farm LLCMemphis, TN 38117$41,000
36R A Pickens & SonPickens, AR 71662$40,432
37Roy Rogers Family Limited PartnershipJonesboro, AR 72404$40,187
38War Saw Farm LLCWhite Hall, AR 71602$39,860
39West Farms IncSherrill, AR 72152$39,322
40Tupelo Land Co. IncNewport, AR 72112$39,118

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag