Total Conservation Programs in Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 20,071
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Arkansas totaled $430,277,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Togo Partners | Memphis, TN 38137 | $582,956 |
42 | Johnny M Foster | Havana, AR 72842 | $572,627 |
43 | Mccool Inc | Danville, AR 72833 | $562,111 |
44 | S E Tucker Plantation LLC | Little Rock, AR 72207 | $558,758 |
45 | Gay Lacy III | Newport, AR 72112 | $548,614 |
46 | John D Naill & Son Inc | Little Rock, AR 72221 | $545,652 |
47 | Fletcher Farm | Little Rock, AR 72206 | $545,242 |
48 | Webb Family Trust | Griffithville, AR 72060 | $544,648 |
49 | Six Pine Trees Inc | El Campo, TX 77437 | $529,817 |
50 | Lazy Acres Farm | Dumas, AR 71639 | $528,488 |
51 | Silvilands Inc | Monticello, AR 71657 | $516,054 |
52 | Reidhar Enterprise Inc | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $515,964 |
53 | Gum Point Land Co LLC | Dumas, AR 71639 | $512,053 |
54 | Brantley Farming Co | England, AR 72046 | $508,527 |
55 | Dale Handly | Monticello, AR 71655 | $508,111 |
56 | I-55 Corp | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $503,815 |
57 | Hasty Family Limited Ptrn | Almyra, AR 72003 | $502,872 |
58 | L'anguille Club LLC | Marion, AR 72364 | $492,169 |
59 | Dorothy Nelon Davis Trust | Little Rock, AR 72212 | $491,703 |
60 | Price Services Inc | Monticello, AR 71655 | $487,001 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”