Total Commodity Programs in Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 321 to 340 of 79,074
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Arkansas totaled $12,746,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
321 | Richard & Shirley Simmons Ptr | Rector, AR 72461 | $3,683,630 |
322 | Sms Planting Company Partnership | Watson, AR 71674 | $3,676,982 |
323 | Ziegenhorn Seed Farms Partnership | Fisher, AR 72429 | $3,671,928 |
324 | Samson Partnership | Dermott, AR 71638 | $3,670,627 |
325 | Matteson Farms | Foreman, AR 71836 | $3,658,302 |
326 | Lyerly Farms | Leachville, AR 72438 | $3,655,294 |
327 | Cache River Farms Ptnrs | Newport, AR 72112 | $3,655,071 |
328 | Calhoun & Son Farms Floyd | Des Arc, AR 72040 | $3,652,389 |
329 | Mason Farming | Brinkley, AR 72021 | $3,651,375 |
330 | Kirkpatrick Farming | Holly Grove, AR 72069 | $3,644,917 |
331 | Amore' Farms | Marion, AR 72364 | $3,643,433 |
332 | Butler Farms Prt | Osceola, AR 72370 | $3,621,075 |
333 | Holmes Farms | Mc Crory, AR 72101 | $3,615,593 |
334 | Massengill Farms | Harrisburg, AR 72432 | $3,614,211 |
335 | Mcdaniel Farms | Forrest City, AR 72335 | $3,603,880 |
336 | Jimmie A Cole & Son | Reyno, AR 72462 | $3,594,042 |
337 | Three Boeckmann Farms II | Wynne, AR 72396 | $3,593,853 |
338 | Dogwood Farms | Portland, AR 71663 | $3,586,972 |
339 | Sandage Farms | Keo, AR 72083 | $3,584,309 |
340 | Eastside Farms | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $3,580,621 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”