Total Conservation Programs in Arkansas County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 281
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Arkansas County, Arkansas totaled $1,502,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Henderson Irrevocable Trust | De Witt, AR 72042 | $11,092 |
42 | D & S Farm | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $11,080 |
43 | Stephanie K Morris | Ulm, AR 72170 | $10,423 |
44 | James K Hughes - James Kenneth Hughes Rev Tr K Hug | Bartlesville, OK 74006 | $10,166 |
45 | S & D Farm Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $9,888 |
46 | Lloyd E Inman III | De Witt, AR 72042 | $9,644 |
47 | Bill C Menard | Gillett, AR 72055 | $9,576 |
48 | Elfreda Oates Estate | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $9,397 |
49 | Rodgers Family Partnership | De Witt, AR 72042 | $9,338 |
50 | Joan Nady | Gillett, AR 72055 | $9,051 |
51 | Adam F Hargrove Jr | De Witt, AR 72042 | $8,945 |
52 | Flag Lake Land Co LLC | Little Rock, AR 72207 | $8,655 |
53 | Fish Lake Planting Co | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $8,606 |
54 | L R J Farms LLC | De Witt, AR 72042 | $8,332 |
55 | Steve Hargrove | De Witt, AR 72042 | $8,298 |
56 | Jesse J Padgett Est Ptnr | Ethel, AR 72048 | $8,144 |
57 | Sweeny Farms Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,974 |
58 | Charles W Manis | Almyra, AR 72003 | $7,913 |
59 | Mark Simpson Or Elaine Simpson | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,788 |
60 | Evermark Land Co LLC | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,592 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”