Total Commodity Programs in Arkansas County, Arkansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 288
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Arkansas County, Arkansas totaled $1,484,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John William & Amy Tarkington | Almyra, AR 72003 | $10,537 |
42 | J & T Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $10,483 |
43 | Greg & Julie Hackney Fm | Gillett, AR 72055 | $10,411 |
44 | G & E Farms Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $10,356 |
45 | M & H Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $10,315 |
46 | Regan Counce Farms Partnership | Dewitt, AR 72042 | $10,123 |
47 | James H Rubach & Sonya R Rubach Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $10,031 |
48 | Robert Jones Jr | Tichnor, AR 72166 | $9,923 |
49 | H 2 Farms | Almyra, AR 72003 | $9,535 |
50 | Jam Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $9,337 |
51 | Blaneldridge Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $9,329 |
52 | Mark Simpson Or Elaine Simpson | De Witt, AR 72042 | $9,075 |
53 | Leder Family Ptrn | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $8,995 |
54 | Drew Counce Farms | De Witt, AR 72042 | $8,844 |
55 | Bjb Farms | Ethel, AR 72048 | $8,808 |
56 | Dean & Katie Price Farm Partnership | Almyra, AR 72003 | $8,803 |
57 | Bauman Farms Ptrn | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $8,724 |
58 | Watkins Farms | De Witt, AR 72042 | $8,677 |
59 | Cris & Heather Simpson Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $8,330 |
60 | Brandon Rodgers Family Ptrn | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $8,302 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”