Farm Subsidy information
Arkansas County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Arkansas County, Arkansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 747
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arkansas County, Arkansas totaled $14,120,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Tph Farms | De Witt, AR 72042 | $51,524 |
62 | Knoll Farms Partnership | Almyra, AR 72003 | $51,315 |
63 | Brian Clark Roth | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $50,610 |
64 | Mark Hargrove & Joyce Hargrove | De Witt, AR 72042 | $49,576 |
65 | Ww Conservation Partnership | Little Rock, AR 72202 | $48,610 |
66 | Blaneldridge Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $47,193 |
67 | 153 Farms Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $46,953 |
68 | Hoskyn Farms Ptrn | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $46,808 |
69 | Farmland Properties LLC | Little Rock, AR 72202 | $46,340 |
70 | Josh & Katie Sollars Partnership | Dewitt, AR 72042 | $46,277 |
71 | Slade Whiting LLC | Tichnor, AR 72166 | $44,622 |
72 | Fischer Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $44,372 |
73 | Brandon Rodgers Family Ptrn | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $44,164 |
74 | Full Quiver Farms | Saint Charles, AR 72140 | $43,602 |
75 | Bovine Farm Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $43,282 |
76 | Jerisa Land Co Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $43,038 |
77 | Elmer Ferguson Farms Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $42,820 |
78 | Rjs Planting Co | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $42,547 |
79 | Dean & Katie Price Farm Partnership | Almyra, AR 72003 | $42,001 |
80 | Bjb Farms | Ethel, AR 72048 | $41,960 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”