Total Commodity Programs in Arkansas County, Arkansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 288
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Arkansas County, Arkansas totaled $1,484,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | John Ed Tarkington Gen Ptrn | Almyra, AR 72003 | $8,135 |
62 | Watkins Family Partnership | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,991 |
63 | J & J Holzhauer Farms | Gillett, AR 72055 | $7,955 |
64 | Mark Berry Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,923 |
65 | William A Davis Or Valerie Davis Jv | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,809 |
66 | Morton Farms Ptrn | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,787 |
67 | Full Quiver Farms | Saint Charles, AR 72140 | $7,668 |
68 | Jeff & Jodi Simpson Partnership | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,523 |
69 | Orlicek Farms Ptr | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,411 |
70 | Handy Ridge | Gillett, AR 72055 | $7,392 |
71 | S N P Farms | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,368 |
72 | Hoskyn Farms Ptrn | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,310 |
73 | Kenneth Maier Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,247 |
74 | Josh & Katie Sollars Partnership | Dewitt, AR 72042 | $7,216 |
75 | Martha Neal | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,182 |
76 | High Point Ag | Gillett, AR 72055 | $7,083 |
77 | R & S Farms Ptrn | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,038 |
78 | David Neal | De Witt, AR 72042 | $6,980 |
79 | Shadwick Farms | De Witt, AR 72042 | $6,972 |
80 | Relyea Farms Partnership | Dewitt, AR 72042 | $6,841 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”