Farm Subsidy information
Arkansas County, Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Arkansas County, Arkansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 747
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arkansas County, Arkansas totaled $14,120,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Billy C Adams | De Witt, AR 72042 | $25,012 |
142 | Relyea Farms Partnership | Dewitt, AR 72042 | $24,193 |
143 | Tarleton Creek Farms Inc | Ethel, AR 72048 | $24,013 |
144 | Circle P Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $23,929 |
145 | Carle Family Farms Jv | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $23,853 |
146 | R&b Relyea Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $23,786 |
147 | Low Doh Farms | Tichnor, AR 72166 | $23,305 |
148 | James Padgett Family Fm LLC | Ethel, AR 72048 | $23,192 |
149 | Third Day Farms | Almyra, AR 72003 | $23,096 |
150 | Flag Lake Planting LLC | Gillett, AR 72055 | $23,024 |
151 | Rng Farms Inc, | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $22,723 |
152 | Hargrove Farm Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $22,614 |
153 | Keneth Smith Farm Inc | Tichnor, AR 72166 | $22,490 |
154 | , | $22,147 | |
155 | Whiting Drier Farm Inc | Tichnor, AR 72166 | $22,043 |
156 | Carver Family Farm LLC | Cabot, AR 72023 | $21,415 |
157 | Raymond Meins Farms Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $20,933 |
158 | D5 Farm Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $20,298 |
159 | Brooks Davis Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $20,270 |
160 | Owl City Hunting Club Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $20,163 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”