Total Disaster Programs in Arkansas County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Arkansas County, Arkansas totaled $929,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Whiting Drier Farm Inc | Tichnor, AR 72166 | $17,426 |
22 | Kagebein Farms Partnership | Almyra, AR 72003 | $16,560 |
23 | Gary & Megan Padgett Ptrn | Almyra, AR 72003 | $16,488 |
24 | Brandon Rodgers Family Ptrn | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $14,694 |
25 | J & T Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $13,678 |
26 | Kerksieck Brothers Farm | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $12,281 |
27 | Mackinley Reece Anderson | Humphrey, AR 72073 | $10,406 |
28 | James Steven Wise | Lonoke, AR 72086 | $9,759 |
29 | Mark Berry Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $9,703 |
30 | Carter Brothers | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $9,563 |
31 | H & K Farms | Saint Charles, AR 72140 | $9,473 |
32 | Timothy W Ables II | Humphrey, AR 72073 | $8,821 |
33 | Mark Simpson Or Elaine Simpson | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,524 |
34 | Blake Kagebein Dba Sbk Farm | Almyra, AR 72003 | $7,141 |
35 | Donald Johnson | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $6,572 |
36 | Stone Family Farms | Almyra, AR 72003 | $6,508 |
37 | Drew Jacobs | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $6,288 |
38 | Bent Knee Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $6,114 |
39 | Lance & Donna Padgett Joint Venture | Ethel, AR 72048 | $5,729 |
40 | Bohanan Ag | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $5,686 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”