Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Arkansas County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 105
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Arkansas County, Arkansas totaled $610,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dickson Land Holding Ltd | De Witt, AR 72042 | $10,090 |
22 | Dorothy L Seidenstricker | De Valls Bluff, AR 72041 | $10,040 |
23 | Pecan Post Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $9,991 |
24 | John Worring | Almyra, AR 72003 | $9,952 |
25 | Mary L Ward Farms | Saint Charles, AR 72140 | $9,912 |
26 | Lester Gillcoatt Farms Inc | De Witt, AR 72042 | $9,452 |
27 | Rodgers Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $9,070 |
28 | Ruben Conrad | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $7,840 |
29 | Mark S Hargrove & Steven E Hargro | De Witt, AR 72042 | $7,225 |
30 | Jkp Farms Inc | Almyra, AR 72003 | $6,888 |
31 | Gary Robnett | Casscoe, AR 72026 | $6,861 |
32 | Adam F Hargrove Jr & Sherrie A Ha | De Witt, AR 72042 | $6,203 |
33 | Lehman Farms | Gillett, AR 72055 | $6,187 |
34 | Cjb Investments Ltd Ptrn | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $6,174 |
35 | Triple C Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $6,012 |
36 | Sidney Horton & Dorothy F Horton | De Witt, AR 72042 | $5,955 |
37 | Juanita Turner | De Witt, AR 72042 | $5,928 |
38 | Hargrove Dirt Works | De Witt, AR 72042 | $5,671 |
39 | John B Alter | De Witt, AR 72042 | $5,584 |
40 | Dan Eldridge Farm Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $5,568 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”