Counter Cyclical Program in Ashley County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 553
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Ashley County, Arkansas totaled $33,348,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | S & C Farm Partnership | Parkdale, AR 71661 | $363,350 |
22 | South Ark Farms | Portland, AR 71663 | $362,450 |
23 | O & C Of Bastrop Inc | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $352,624 |
24 | Otwell & Otwell Partnership | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $346,232 |
25 | Bryan A Everett Farms | Premont, TX 78375 | $330,268 |
26 | Bond And Son Inc | Portland, AR 71663 | $330,073 |
27 | Mccain & Mccain Partnership | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $326,062 |
28 | Frances Shackelford Trustee | Portland, AR 71663 | $322,989 |
29 | Sampolesi Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $321,907 |
30 | Dry Bayou Land Co | Parkdale, AR 71661 | $310,332 |
31 | Jhm Farms Inc | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $307,989 |
32 | Ka-be Farms | Dermott, AR 71638 | $299,475 |
33 | Crossley Farms | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $289,327 |
34 | Jackie Mccain Farm Corp | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $286,297 |
35 | Thebes General Partnership | Portland, AR 71663 | $276,419 |
36 | E & J Of Bastrop Inc | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $255,468 |
37 | Bruce Bond | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $241,198 |
38 | Cochran And Company | Portland, AR 71663 | $220,361 |
39 | Leyden Pugh Inc | Portland, AR 71663 | $216,958 |
40 | Susan Hogan Inc | Portland, AR 71663 | $216,946 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”