Total Conservation Programs in Ashley County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 263
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Ashley County, Arkansas totaled $13,681,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hawkins Trusts Farms LLC | Covington, LA 70433 | $146,618 |
22 | Sullivan Family Ltd Ptrshp | Hamburg, AR 71646 | $145,165 |
23 | Joe & Lezlie Foote LLC | Hamburg, AR 71646 | $143,898 |
24 | Quackers LLC | El Dorado, AR 71730 | $142,237 |
25 | Ben Carlton Lawrence | Portland, AR 71663 | $138,285 |
26 | Scroggins Enterprises | Hot Springs National, AR 71913 | $128,672 |
27 | Willie E Tullos | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $126,386 |
28 | Sunshine Agriculture Incorporated | Memphis, TN 38138 | $125,676 |
29 | Jane Graves | Mountain Home, AR 72654 | $115,911 |
30 | Rebecca B Shackelford Trust | Portland, AR 71663 | $114,494 |
31 | W Stacey Gillison | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $111,272 |
32 | Canada Bend Farms LLC | Kilgore, TX 75662 | $108,420 |
33 | Quintin T Cone III | Frisco, TX 75034 | $103,319 |
34 | Diane C Sperry | Johns Creek, GA 30097 | $103,300 |
35 | Caren C Procter | Haughton, LA 71037 | $91,941 |
36 | Carl R Caldwell | Springdale, AR 72762 | $91,093 |
37 | Ronald L Miller | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $86,116 |
38 | John M Bosch | Newman, IL 61942 | $82,826 |
39 | Boydell & Bartholomew Farm | Dermott, AR 71638 | $76,299 |
40 | Lms Ivy Farms | Portland, AR 71663 | $73,847 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”