Farm Subsidy information

Ashley County, Arkansas

Total Subsidies in Ashley County, Arkansas, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,507

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ashley County, Arkansas totaled $365,681,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
41Royal C Farms LLCCrossett, AR 71635$1,514,008
42Hartshorn Farms PartnershipHamburg, AR 71646$1,487,490
43Simmons 1st National Bank **Lake Village, AR 71653$1,480,273
44Ash More Farm PartnershipMer Rouge, LA 71261$1,407,199
45Gay Farms IncPortland, AR 71663$1,395,985
46Shell Farms IncHamburg, AR 71646$1,388,711
47Levee View Farm IncLake Village, AR 71653$1,369,404
48Smiles FarmsMc Gehee, AR 71654$1,327,799
49Frances W Shackelford TrustPortland, AR 71663$1,324,810
50Rebecca B Shackelford TrustPortland, AR 71663$1,300,754
51Crop Production PartnershipPortland, AR 71663$1,277,555
52Weatherly Rice Farms IncWilmot, AR 71676$1,273,491
53Scroggins EnterprisesHot Springs National, AR 71913$1,251,438
54Louis Craig Shackelford TrustPortland, AR 71663$1,248,028
55Sampolesi FarmsLake Village, AR 71653$1,232,927
56Sunshine PartnershipPortland, AR 71663$1,230,592
57C & C Wilmot Farms IncWilmot, AR 71676$1,221,886
58Bond And Son IncPortland, AR 71663$1,193,975
59Gladys P Shackelford TrustPortland, AR 71663$1,188,807
60G & G Farms PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$1,169,944

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag