Loan Deficiency in Ashley County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 512
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Ashley County, Arkansas totaled $20,545,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Mccain & Mccain Partnership | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $66,472 |
82 | Borg Agri Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $66,153 |
83 | Crossley Farms | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $65,855 |
84 | Thebes General Partnership | Portland, AR 71663 | $65,552 |
85 | Kimbro Johnson & Son Ptrshp | Montrose, AR 71658 | $64,680 |
86 | Jhm Farms Inc | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $64,504 |
87 | Michael Pruitt | Oak Grove, LA 71263 | $63,918 |
88 | Newcome Farms Inc | Portland, AR 71663 | $63,498 |
89 | Lavada Crowe & Sons Ptrshp | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $62,664 |
90 | J And A Farm Partnership | Dumas, AR 71639 | $61,471 |
91 | W & C Wells Farms Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $61,028 |
92 | B & L Of Ashley County Arkansas | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $60,849 |
93 | L & J Of Ashley County Arkansas | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $60,181 |
94 | Lavada Crowe & Sons Ptrshp | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $58,369 |
95 | Bryan A Everett Farms | Premont, TX 78375 | $58,307 |
96 | Bobby Fisher Farms | Portland, AR 71663 | $58,247 |
97 | B & J Of Ashley County Arkansas | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $57,173 |
98 | O & C Of Bastrop Inc | Mer Rouge, LA 71261 | $55,091 |
99 | Gar Hole Co | Montrose, AR 71658 | $54,761 |
100 | Upper Carter Partnership | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $54,386 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”