Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Carroll County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 113
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Carroll County, Arkansas totaled $907,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Bart Edwards | Berryville, AR 72616 | $6,458 |
82 | Wilburn Gene Fultz | Green Forest, AR 72638 | $6,250 |
83 | Ronnie D Mccullough | Berryville, AR 72616 | $6,250 |
84 | Gregg Luebbering | Green Forest, AR 72638 | $6,250 |
85 | Scott Kilbourn | Green Forest, AR 72638 | $6,000 |
86 | Coy Newberry | Berryville, AR 72616 | $5,750 |
87 | Elmer Coy Huff | Alpena, AR 72611 | $5,404 |
88 | Jimmy Jones | Berryville, AR 72616 | $5,275 |
89 | Clay Standlee | Berryville, AR 72616 | $5,243 |
90 | Charlie Johnson | Berryville, AR 72616 | $5,226 |
91 | Danny Rudd | Alpena, AR 72611 | $5,201 |
92 | Ben A Ratzlaff | Green Forest, AR 72638 | $5,025 |
93 | Grace P Mcgehee | Alpena, AR 72611 | $5,011 |
94 | Clifford Hostetler | Berryville, AR 72616 | $4,688 |
95 | Chester Hostetler | Berryville, AR 72616 | $4,687 |
96 | Dennis Fellers | Harrison, AR 72601 | $4,613 |
97 | Robert T Holtkamp | Green Forest, AR 72638 | $4,425 |
98 | Paula L Swofford | Berryville, AR 72616 | $4,400 |
99 | Jerry James | Green Forest, AR 72638 | $4,000 |
100 | Keith Turner | Berryville, AR 72616 | $4,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”