Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 387
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $9,609,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bilberry Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $105,873 |
22 | Elliott Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $105,228 |
23 | Bayou Mason Planting Company | Eudora, AR 71640 | $101,752 |
24 | Lane Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $99,154 |
25 | Charles Poole Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $97,706 |
26 | Stevens Farm Partnership | Dermott, AR 71638 | $97,413 |
27 | Claude And Diane Grubbs Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $96,921 |
28 | Ms Delta Organics LLC | Leland, MS 38756 | $95,140 |
29 | Rice Innovators Partnership | Monticello, AR 71655 | $93,672 |
30 | Elliott Brothers Farm Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $91,240 |
31 | Bobby Roark & Sons Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $89,904 |
32 | Paul And Kathy Dunavant General Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $88,848 |
33 | Paul And Stacy Dunavant Farm | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $87,332 |
34 | B Pieroni Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $81,272 |
35 | Rankin Inc | Eudora, AR 71640 | $81,255 |
36 | Daniel And Brooke Dunavant Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $80,369 |
37 | Rdak LLC | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $80,339 |
38 | Ashton Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $77,338 |
39 | South Ark Farms | Portland, AR 71663 | $76,390 |
40 | Edp Vaughn Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $73,644 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”