Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Chicot County, Arkansas, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 343

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $4,252,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2021
21Two Adams FarmsDermott, AR 71638$49,130
22Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint VentureLake Village, AR 71653$48,312
23Nicholas PieroniLake Village, AR 71653$47,751
24Ms Delta Organics LLCLeland, MS 38756$45,937
25Ashton FarmsLake Village, AR 71653$43,899
26Daniel And Brooke Dunavant Farms PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$43,277
27Bayou Mason Planting CompanyEudora, AR 71640$41,944
28Claude And Diane Grubbs FarmsEudora, AR 71640$41,813
29Edp Vaughn FarmsLake Village, AR 71653$40,277
30Paul And Stacy Dunavant FarmLake Village, AR 71653$39,305
31Charles Poole FarmsEudora, AR 71640$39,010
32Rankin IncEudora, AR 71640$36,690
33G.k. Farm Management, IncLake Village, AR 71653$35,717
34Tad KellerLake Village, AR 71653$35,041
35Paul And Kathy Dunavant General PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$34,497
36Myers FarmsEudora, AR 71640$34,324
37Barry Brantley Farm LLCLake Village, AR 71653$33,726
38Belle PartnershipEudora, AR 71640$33,665
39A And J Mazzanti PartnershipLake Village, AR 71653$33,521
40Joshua & Bailey LingoLake Village, AR 71653$33,305

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag