Total Disaster Programs in Chicot County, Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 166
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $3,480,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sterlington Plantation Inc | Eudora, AR 71640 | $44,808 |
22 | Poole Farms | Parkdale, AR 71661 | $44,393 |
23 | Jackie C Johnson | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $44,033 |
24 | Irvin Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $41,747 |
25 | Dinah D Ayecock | Tillar, AR 71670 | $41,419 |
26 | Sampolesi Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $40,256 |
27 | M & T Farms Partnership | Eudora, AR 71640 | $37,589 |
28 | Raymond L And Louise G Pieroni Farm Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $36,158 |
29 | Matthew Madden Fortenberry | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $35,892 |
30 | Lisa S Fortenberry | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $35,892 |
31 | Keith's Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $30,938 |
32 | Bilberry Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $30,454 |
33 | R C Farms Inc | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $29,409 |
34 | Epstein Land Co | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $28,302 |
35 | Tommy Brown | Eudora, AR 71640 | $26,181 |
36 | Myers Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $25,177 |
37 | Sam E Angel | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $23,950 |
38 | Olan Mencer | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $23,688 |
39 | Third Arm Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $23,025 |
40 | Sam And Rodney Angel Partners | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $22,352 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”