Market Loss Assistance Program in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 988
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $31,291,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | David Steritz | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $126,502 |
62 | Bobby H Miller | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $126,239 |
63 | James Steritz | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $125,717 |
64 | Jaquelyn Steritz | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $125,717 |
65 | Quality Farms Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $125,522 |
66 | John-jordan Farms Inc | Eudora, AR 71640 | $125,242 |
67 | John H Gates | Eudora, AR 71640 | $124,785 |
68 | Lakeport Farm Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $123,332 |
69 | Chw Farms Inc | Wilmot, AR 71676 | $122,381 |
70 | Dunavant Farming Co Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $121,882 |
71 | Dennis Huggins | Yazoo City, MS 39194 | $121,364 |
72 | Chicot Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $120,829 |
73 | Warren Keith Miller | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $118,341 |
74 | Will Grubbs | Eudora, AR 71640 | $118,273 |
75 | Kimberly Grubbs | Eudora, AR 71640 | $118,273 |
76 | Michael Paul Minsky | Eudora, AR 71640 | $118,071 |
77 | Janis Rubio | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $117,760 |
78 | Sunshine Farms Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $117,650 |
79 | Hyner Farm Inc | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $116,905 |
80 | Don Naron | Dermott, AR 71638 | $116,856 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”