Total Commodity Programs in Chicot County, Arkansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 297
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $1,160,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Third Arm Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $3,704 |
82 | A And J Mazzanti Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $3,510 |
83 | Baugh Farms Inc | Dermott, AR 71638 | $3,450 |
84 | Christopher D Soules | Lamont, IA 50650 | $3,393 |
85 | John H Gates | Eudora, AR 71640 | $3,390 |
86 | Paul And Stacy Dunavant Farm | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $3,382 |
87 | Ash Farms LLC | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $3,339 |
88 | Patricia Baugh | Dermott, AR 71638 | $3,286 |
89 | Kmb Partnership | Dermott, AR 71638 | $3,105 |
90 | Dunavant Family Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $3,090 |
91 | Sheila Welty | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $3,088 |
92 | Stanley L Welty | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $3,088 |
93 | Johnston Farms Inc | Little Rock, AR 72202 | $2,908 |
94 | Olan Mencer | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $2,889 |
95 | March Farm Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $2,876 |
96 | S & E Myers Farm Inc | Eudora, AR 71640 | $2,784 |
97 | Lang Farms Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $2,757 |
98 | Larry Miles Farms | Dermott, AR 71638 | $2,717 |
99 | Robert E And Marilyn Dunavant Joint Venture | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $2,536 |
100 | Jackie C Johnson | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $2,461 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”