Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Chicot County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 130
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $2,543,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | William Bradford Sr | Eudora, AR 71640 | $1,509 |
102 | Charles Brown | Carrollton, TX 75007 | $1,390 |
103 | Daniel R Clark | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $1,336 |
104 | Nicholas Pieroni | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $1,254 |
105 | Commercial Capital Bank ** | Delhi, LA 71232 | $1,241 |
106 | Wayne Ester | Eudora, AR 71640 | $1,165 |
107 | Dunavant Family Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $1,117 |
108 | Cody Ray Mencer | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $1,062 |
109 | Sarah Butler | Eudora, AR 71640 | $1,033 |
110 | Lakehall LLC | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $1,008 |
111 | Skyler King | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $942 |
112 | Pj Properties Inc | Jones, LA 71250 | $848 |
113 | 4-f Farms Of Louisiana Inc | Lake Providence, LA 71254 | $810 |
114 | Bill Martar | Eudora, AR 71640 | $730 |
115 | Treyvion Patrick | Eudora, AR 71640 | $718 |
116 | Vincent And Betty S Pieroni Farm | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $709 |
117 | Phyllis Rankin Craft | Eudora, AR 71640 | $600 |
118 | Lana Rankin Parker | Eudora, AR 71640 | $600 |
119 | Randy M Rankin | Eudora, AR 71640 | $600 |
120 | William Curtice Rankin | Eudora, AR 71640 | $600 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”